In April of last year, the White House released an Executive Order to bump the minimum wage to $15 per hour for all workers employed by federal contractors. Now, this decision seems prescient as inflation and the cost of living hammer low-income workers.

Despite the order, which resulted in more than 4.1 million Americans getting a wage increase, many federal workers are still struggling to pay for basics like food, shelter, and healthcare. This is a problem all across America, including in my city of Alexandria, Virginia, which is a stone’s throw from the nation’s capital.

Today, the federal contract workers who are arguably struggling the most are those employed by companies operating under the Service Contract Act. These “blended federal workforce” employees typically consist of individuals from low-income communities – often women of color – performing work such as housekeeping.

These folks are not well-compensated contractors working for the defense or consulting industries. Rather, these are the essential workers who keep our government functioning.

Although President Joe Biden’s minimum wage increase did put more money in the pockets of the more junior employees, it failed to benefit the more senior workers with longer tenure and experience. As a result, those who have a decade of experience are being paid the same amount as those who have only 1 or 2 years of experience. This workplace phenomenon is known as wage compression, and for some of these workers, it has led to their striking and demanding better salaries and benefits.

Ultimately, this issue is about fairness.

Because many SCA contracts were signed before Biden’s federal minimum wage increase, the SCA does not address wage compression. To raise salaries and increase benefits for all of their employees, especially the more experienced workers, contracting companies must cut into their own revenues. This is not fair to the companies implementing these projects because it reduces the profits the SCA contract promised they would earn.

Of course, additional Executive Orders from the White House could mandate employers pay more. But a new President could overturn them, increasing unpredictability for both employers and workers.

This is fixable.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill should consider creating a formal process allowing companies that operate within the SCA to apply for more federal dollars that could only be used for employee compensation and benefits. Again, the corporations complying with the SCA would not be entitled to additional profits but only more money to ensure their workforce is compensated fairly.

Congressional reform of the SCA is also in the best interest of Americans because if a federal contract worker – for example, at a call center for seniors with questions about a program like Social Security or their veterans’ benefits – is underpaid, overworked, and understandably becomes resentful, it is the taxpayer who may receive less reliable customer service. Anyone who has ever earned a salary understands that workers respond positively to being compensated fairly, or negatively to being under-appreciated.

In the name of fairness, I hope Congress will pass legislation to modernize the SCA. Only then will President Biden’s Executive Order to raise the minimum wage for federal government contract workers benefit both new and tenured employees, all of whom deserve to be rewarded for their commitment to public service.

Allison Silberberg is a former mayor of Alexandria, Virginia, and a board member of Centrist Democrats of America.

Have an opinion?

This article is an Op-Ed and as such, the opinions expressed are those of the authors. If you would like to respond, or have an editorial of your own you would like to submit, please email Federal Times Senior Managing Editor Cary O’Reilly..

Want more perspectives like this sent straight to you? Subscribe to get our Commentary & Opinion newsletter once a week.

Share:
More In Opinions
How can governments prepare for bioweapon attacks?
The tools needed to test, trace and treat both natural and intentional viral outbreaks are similar. But as future bio-attacks may be coordinated with financial, cyber or kinetic actions, the need for the military to sustain robust and dedicated capabilities to counter biothreats is paramount.
Lessons learned from the pandemic in modernizing public health systems
Agency leaders from Ventura County, California, and Winnebago, Illinois, spoke about how they transformed their technology infrastructure and processes to handle COVID-19 and how they plan to replicate and scale these changes to impact service delivery beyond pandemic-related needs.
Mission Possible: Securing remote access for classified networks
The Federal government understands the significance of remote access on meeting mission objectives now and in the future. Agency leaders are looking to the private sector for technology that helps them maintain the highest security levels while meeting the ease-of-access demands of today’s worker – and can be implemented quickly.
In Other News
Why do federal pay raises lag the private sector?
The federal budget proposal unveiled by the White House in March included an average pay increase of 4.6% for civilian federal workers, matching a planned military pay raise. Historically, with pay lagging in the federal sector, other factors including steady opportunities, competitive benefits and hybrid work to retain talent.
Load More